9/11 TV Fakery

Re: Socalled NO PLANE research. There is some evidence that THE SECOND IMPACT into the SOUTH TOWER was NOT CAUSED BY A Boeing 767, the pictures we all saw, were FAKE. Marcus Icke's Flight Simulator research shows other evidence. BTW, the FIRST IMPACT is also fishy.

But lets hear Nico Haupt:

On Sunday July 23, 2006 http://911tvfakery.blogspot.com presented their findings at HOPE6 on apparent evidence, that the footage of the second attack on the South Tower on Sep11th, 2001 was doctored and included a CGI (Computer Generated Image).

The findings conclude, that if the evidence shows that footage was doctored, yet another notion could be concluded: No plane hit the South Tower.

2 live broadcasts (FOX5 vs. ABC7, picked up by FOXNEWS, CNN and others) conflict each other with conflicting simulated flight paths of an incoming black aircraft silhouette.

The live footage was filmed with a WESCAM (since 2002 L-3 Communications) equipped unidentified helicopter crew and unidentified camera operators.

The findings at http://911tvfakery.blogspot.com furthermore show other irregular behavior of other aircraft silhouettes in not live aired footage.

The apparent CGIs are changing their shape, do not shrink or grow though zooms are used, rotate suddenly, loose wings in the air at one moment, entering into the tower object with different size conflicting other 'footage', contradict each other with other simulated flight paths, do not crumble the walls or break apart but buttering into the South Tower and showing other unrealistic behavior which violates laws of physics.

The findings at 911tvfakery.blogspot are facing extreme hostility within the 9/11 'truth' movement but also triggered rising support of veteran 9/11 researchers and 'newbies'. The findings of 911TVFakery haven't been addressed in US Mainstream media yet, while all other so called smoking guns attracted attention at CNN, FOX, NY Times, Washington Post, MAXIM, Vanity Fair and many other outlets. The most popular 9/11 video, "Loose Change" decided not to address the findings of 911TVFakery.blogspot.com

The (9/11 research- and activism) bio of the author of the blog, Nico Haupt aka ewing2001 is available at http://911closeup.com/nico/911bio.html He's also still with another research team http://www.team8plus.org and was co-founder of the 9/11 Science and Justice Alliance (2002-2006). The findings of the 9/11SCAJA inspired David Ray Griffin for his first book and triggered the popularity of the evidence for 'controlled demolition' of the Twin Towers and WTC7.

Haupt aka ewing2001, a veteran 9/11 researcher since the morning of Sep11th, also occasionally addresses the infiltration of the 9/11 Truth Movement but also the media manipulation and infiltration itself, also on the Internet. http://team8plus.org/e107_plugins/forum/forum_viewtopic.php?3223 He's also addressing the growing power of private- and military contractors like SAIC etc... http://team8plus.org/e107_plugins/forum/forum_viewtopic.php?1664 and the real role of the NSA regarding 9/11. http://team8plus.org/e107_plugins/forum/forum_viewtopic.php?2890

Questions about who faked the 9/11-footage, why did the perps find it necessary to fake it and who has the power to cover it up, are so far unchallenged from popular 9/11 groups like 911truth.org or 9/11 Scholars (st911.org), though many 9/11 scholars are supportive of the debate on these findings.

A collection of other related articles is also located at http://911closeup.com/nico Furthermore supportive of the issue is http://covertoperations.blogspot.com

The conflicting footage of the 2nd attack can be compared at http://killtown.911review.org/2nd-hit.html